Skip to content.
Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home » kickoff » Kick-off presentations » Measurement methods. Christophe Strobbe, K.U.Leuven

Measurement methods. Christophe Strobbe, K.U.Leuven

Document Actions

Measurement Methods

Christophe Strobbe, K.U.Leuven, Belgium

What Basis for Measurements?

Example from web accessibility:

One can distinguish between several types of documents, each with a slightly different purpose:

guideline
general advice on what a developer or author should do or avoid; e.g. Don't rely on color alone
success criterion
specific requirement formulated as a testable statement; e.g. Captions are provided for live synchronized media
technique
concrete technical procedure that a developer or author can follow when implementing a guideline or to fulfill a success criterion
test (for evaluation)
concrete technical procedure that an evaluator can follow to check whether specific content or functionality meets the requirements of a guideline or a success criterion
law
(can be generic or technically precise)
Examples: BITV in Duitsland is gebaseerd op een vertaling van WCAG 1.0 (BITV in HTML, BITV in PDF); Section 508 in the USA was based on a working draft of WCAG 1.0 (see Jim Thatcher: Side by Side WCAG vs. 508); in some countries the law requires that websites are accessible, without defining criteria for accessibility; other countries rely on general anti-discrimination legislation.

In this context, these different types of documents are focused on different types of users:

  • guidelines, best practices and techniques focus on the authors or developers (those who provide the information or application);
  • success criteria (in the case of WCAG 2.0) focus on the user of the information or application;
  • tests focus on evaluators of web sites or applications.

Evaluation: Steps / Structure

Scope and sampling

  • manual sampling of pages
  • automatic sampling of pages

= independent of UWEM

Not in UWEM:

  • scenarios for end-users

Evaluation

Tests:

  • unambiguous, based on existing criteria (WCAG 1.0)
  • pass/fail
  • fail (one or more) = non-conformance

Test execution:

  • expert evaluation (all tests)
  • automatic evaluation (only fully automatable tests)

Test section = "pluggable"

Not in UWEM:

  • end-user evaluation

User satisfaction?

  • accessibility = baseline
    • perceivable
    • operable
    • understandable
    • robust
  • WCAG = one step removed from user experience

Reporting

  • conformance claim (relevant outside WCAG/UWEM?)
  • text-based report
  • machine-readable report (relevant outside WCAG/UWEM?)
  • scorecard report

Created by andrea
Last modified 2008-06-02 11:44
 

Powered by Plone

This site conforms to the following standards: